Talking Jesus Doll
USAToday is reporting that the Marines’ charity ‘Toys for Tots’ has turned down on offer for 4,000 talking Jesus dolls. Personally, I don’t see this as any big deal. I actually agree with the notion that Muslim parents are going to flip when they see their little kids playing with a talking Jesus doll.
Although, I’m not sure I agree much with giving away Jesus dolls in any setting, and in any form. Now, I’m not saying that I am opposed to any kind of biblical action figure, doll, or toy set. Certainly there is an element of using visible objects to teach young children basic knowledge of the scriptures. But, I’m just not sold on creating a doll of Jesus, who is God in the flesh. What about you?
Does it violate the first commandment about graven images? Well, in my opinion, not really, though it could lead to that. No, I’m more concerned with the commandment that follows: You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.
Misunderstanding of this commandment is pretty common, as most Christians unfortunately associate the breaking of this commandment as saying things like ‘Oh my God!’, or other vulgar terms with the name ‘God’ or ‘Jesus’ in them. However, I don’t believe that is what God is communicating here. If that were the case, then this is the single easiest commandment to obey. Just don’t say G-D, just say ‘oh my gosh’, or gosh-darn-it instead. Pretty easy to obey, huh? That's one reason why I believe God has the heart in mind when He commands this here, not simply the mouth. Taking the Lord’s name in vain is an attitude of the heart.
Vain means ‘worthless’, ‘irreverent’, ‘flippant’, etc. It means not taking God seriously, or His character seriously, or His commandments seriously, or worship in His name seriously, or His nature seriously. It is irreverent worship, an irreverent, unholy life, all under the heading of God's name. It is defaming His character.
So, why do I bring this up with the talking Jesus dolls? I’m not trying to spoil anyone’s fun here, but I do wonder if this can cause us to take Jesus flippantly -like He’s some kind of buddy of ours. Listen, Jesus was submissive, humble, meek and lowly while He was on earth, but after He was raised, we get a glimpse of Him on the throne in first few chapters of Revelation:
“…One like a son of man, clothed with a long robe and with a golden sash around his chest. The hairs of his head were white like wool, as white as snow. His eyes were like a flame of fire, his feet were like burnished bronze, refined in a furnace, and his voice was like the roar of many waters. In his right hand he held seven stars, from his mouth came a sharp two-edged sword, and his face was like the sun shining in full strength. When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead.” – Rev 1:13Thus, I think there is danger in communicating a nice, happy, friendly Jesus who’s everybody’s best friend, and whose figure is no different than any other action figure (except minus the cool stuff like guns, swords and gadgets). Does this really plant an image of the Biblical Jesus into the minds of children? I have a hard time getting there. And if we have an incorrect image or understanding of Jesus, what is that in biblical terms? Well of course, that would be an idol. So we're back to the first commandment…
I’d love to hear your thoughts.
SDG


10 Exhortations:
Ever seen those "children's" Bibles? Of course, once you excise the more troublesome parts that would scandalize a child, you're left with something that would fit on a cocktail napkin, which is about the depth of these illustrated versions. These "chummy Jesus" dolls seem to be in the same vein, it seems.
I don't know. Do we really want to present the Christ of the Book of Revelation to 8 year olds? On the one hand, presenting a partial Gospel seems to be like pulling the "bait and switch" where we replace the friendly version of G-d with a different version once the child reaches the "age of reason". On the other hand, I'm not sure that presenting EVERYTHING is the best route, since (and I must be honest here) some passages would cause more sensitive children to wind up with nightmares at the least.
So is it "irreverant" to present a watered-down theology with these dolls? No. I think one needs to consider what one's capabilities of understanding are.
- james
Nathan,
Excellent, excellent thoughts on taking the name of the Lord in vain. I definitely think that is the crux of the meaning of the commandment. Could we then say that everytime we do something "in the name of Christianity" (ie. in the name of Christ,) with the wrong motive, it is taking God's name in vain? After all, did not the Lord Jesus teach us that all our acts of service should be in the name of Christ, even something as simple as giving a glass of water to someone? For example, if I were to sing a song in church, or pray or preach, and I did it with wrong motives, would I not be taking God's name in vain?
About the doll--One thing is for sure, the makers of that doll are taking the name of the Lord in vain. They are making that doll for one reason--MONEY. And I really wonder what the Lord God Amighty thinks about people making a toy doll of Him. Oh, yeah, and giving a child a toy Jesus to play and have fun is a great way to teach your child to fear and respect God.
Overheard pieces of conversations in homes where one of the kids has a Jesus doll:
1. "Mom! Jimmy ripped off Jesus's head again!"
2. "Now, Sally, we've already talked about this: I don't want you bringing Jesus to church. He might get lost there."
3. "Okay, who dressed my Jesus in Barbie clothes?"
4. "OUCH! That's it! If I trip over this Jesus one more time, he's going in the trash! I mean it!"
5. "Daddy! Joey lost his Jesus and then he took mine and says it's his."
6. "Okay, okay...I'll let you hold Jesus if I can play with your Game Boy."
LOL. That's hilarious.
James,
Thanks for the comment. I see your point, though I'm not sure I completely agree. We certainly wouldn't want to show our children JUST the depiction of Christ in Revelation, but I fear that over-emphasizing His 'niceness' might be what's communicated through the doll.
Davide,
Hmm, you got me thinking about the wrong motives thing. Personally, I'm careful about how much I focus on my own motives. Yes, they are very important, but I can almost always, always find a hint of wrong motives in every single thing that I do. The beautiful thing about imputation is that all of our good works now are spiritual sacrifices to God, and that even in our wrong motives, our works have been perfected in Christ. That is not to say, however, that motives should be ignored. But, I do agree with you that wrong motives or just simply irreverance is taking the Lord's name in vain. If we call ourselves Christians, if we gather to worship Christ, then we need to take heed to proceeding with honor and reverance.
Gordan,
Ha, I don't have children just yet, but you're giving me some things to look forward too :)
Are you sure that is a talking Jesus doll, or Billy Ray Cyrus in a White Robe?
Free Grace,
LOL! Ha, good point. That's another reason why I'm not crazy about the whole doll/image thing -the Bible never tells us what He looks like, and to guess is to well...make Him in our image. Oops!
SDG
Nathan,
Good point about about the intrinsic tendency of us to have hints of wrong motives in everything we do. I definitely agree with you. What about acts of service that are done PRIMARILY with the wrong motives? For example, could we say that a church is violating this commandment if it presents music, media, drama etc. for the sole the main purpose of entertainment, drawing crowds, or money?
Nathan, I enjoy your blog..I have it listed as one of my recommended blogs...I hope that is ok! Blessings!
~Josh
Talking Jesus doll. Excelent! I can put him next to my Hercules doll. (pre-Jesus Jesus) When is the rest of the fictional gods come out? I need a Neptune over my fishtank.
Maybe they can come out next with the stoning playset, or burkas for your Barbie.
Post a Comment